Krisis Objektivitas Siaran Langsung: Analisis Etika Penyiaran pada Kontroversi Lomba Cerdas Cermat MPR RI 2026 di TVRI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/jodicom.v1i3.363Keywords:
media objectivity, , live broadcast, broadcasting ethics, Quiz Competition, TVRIAbstract
This study examines the objectivity crisis in the live broadcast of the 2026 MPR RI Empat Pilar Quiz Competition (LCC) aired by TVRI. Using a qualitative content analysis approach within the normative framework of the Broadcasting Code of Conduct and Program Standards (P3SPS) and the social responsibility theory of the press, the study identifies four main findings: inconsistent scoring decisions for substantially similar answers, absence of audio-visual replay mechanisms during the clarification process, shifting argumentation by jury members from substantive to articulatory aspects, and a host communication style oriented toward program continuity rather than process transparency. The analysis reveals that objectivity crises do not always stem from deliberate bias but may also arise from procedural communication limitations in dynamic live broadcast situations. The study recommends strengthening verification mechanisms, developing more transparent clarification procedures, and improving the quality of host communication as strategic measures to enhance the credibility and public trust of broadcasting institutions.
References
Brennen, B. S. (2017). Qualitative research methods for media studies (2nd ed.), 112–115. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315621661.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Polity Press, 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017729681.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, 209–215. 10.1080/15424065.2022.2046231.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press, 12 (2), 2–3 https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930730608.
Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia. (2012). Peraturan KPI Nomor 01/P/KPI/03/2012 tentang Pedoman Perilaku Penyiaran. KPI. https://jdih.kpi.go.id/guest/product/show/119.
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. 24–28 https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781.
McQuail, D. (1992). Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest. Canadian Journal of Communication, 18, (1),
https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.1993v18n4a783.
Morissan. (2013). Teori komunikasi massa: Media, budaya, dan masyarakat. Ghalia Indonesia, 45–47.
Morissan. (2015). Manajemen media penyiaran: Strategi mengelola radio dan televisi (Ed. Revisi). Prenadamedia Group.
Republik Indonesia. (2002). Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2002 tentang Penyiaran. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2002 Nomor 139. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/44500/uu-no-32-tahun-2002.
Republik Indonesia. (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 13 Tahun 2005 tentang Lembaga Penyiaran Publik Televisi Republik Indonesia. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2005 Nomor 30.
Republik Indonesia. (2006). Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2006 tentang Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2006 Nomor 85. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/49344/pp-no-13-tahun-2005.
Siebert, F. S., Peterson, T., & Schramm, W. (1956). Four theories of the press. University of Illinois Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Al Firdaus Fikry, Aldy Reza Firdaus, Anpoen Syfaul Qalbi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CONTACT US
