- ABOUT THE JOURNAL
- Publication Process
- Generative AI
- Announcements
- Journal Contact
- Managing Editor
- Editor and Editorial Board
- Reviewers
- Aims & Scope
- Ethics and Malpractice
- Author Guidelines
- Submissions
- Copyrights, Permissions, Licensing
- About this Publishing System
- Peer Review Process
- Open Access Policy
- Archiving
- Privacy Statement
- Fair Play
- Confidentiality
- Disclosure And Conflicts Of Interest
- Duties Of Reviewers
- Indexing And Abstracting
- Post-Publication Discussion
Peer Review Process
Jurnal Peurawi: Media Kajian Komunikasi Islam uses an online submission and review system. The submission and peer review of every article must be managed through this system, in accordance with the following Peer Review Policy.
- Jurnal Peurawi Editorial Board is responsible for selecting papers and appointing reviewers.
- Articles are typically reviewed by at least two independent reviewers.
- The review is double-blind: reviewers do not know the identity of the authors, and authors do not know the identity of the reviewers.
- The review process considers novelty, objectivity, methodology, scientific impact, conclusions, and references.
- The final decision on whether a manuscript is accepted rests with the Editorial Board, based on the reviewers’ critical comments.
- The Section Editor communicates the final decision to the corresponding author, based on the reviewers’ recommendations.
- The Jurnal Peurawi Editorial Board protects the confidentiality of all material submitted to the journal and of all communications with reviewers.




Correspondence: