- ABOUT THE JOURNAL
- Publication Process
- Generative AI
- Announcements
- Journal Contact
- Managing Editor
- Editor and Editorial Board
- Reviewers
- Aims & Scope
- Ethics and Malpractice
- Author Guidelines
- Submissions
- Copyrights, Permissions, Licensing
- About this Publishing System
- Peer Review Process
- Open Access Policy
- Archiving
- Privacy Statement
- Fair Play
- Confidentiality
- Disclosure And Conflicts Of Interest
- Duties Of Reviewers
- Indexing And Abstracting
- Post-Publication Discussion
Duties Of Reviewers
DUTIES OF REVIEWERS
Contribution to Editorial Conclusions
The editor will be assisted by peer review in reaching editorial decisions, and may also help the author to improve the article through communications with the author conducted via the Jurnal Peurawi OJS system.
Timeliness
Any appointed reviewer assigned to assess the research contained in a manuscript who feels unqualified to review it, or who is aware that a timely review will not be possible, should notify the editor and withdraw from the review process.
Privacy
Any documents received for review must be treated as confidential material. They must not be disclosed to, or discussed with, others except as authorised by the editor.
Standards of Neutrality
The review process should be conducted fairly. Personal criticism of the author is unacceptable. Reviewers must express their views clearly, supported by appropriate argument.
Correspondence: