Power Communication and the Production of Obedience in Animal Farm

A Critical Discourse Analysis

Authors

  • Hana Restu Pratiwi Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta image/svg+xml Author
  • Firly Annisa Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22373/s35tv741

Keywords:

Animal Farm, critical discourse analysis, power communication

Abstract

This study examines how power communication practices shape obedience and silence among subordinate groups through a critical discourse analysis of George Orwell’s Animal Farm. Grounded in a critical paradigm and qualitative approach, the study applies Critical Discourse Analysis by integrating Norman Fairclough’s and Teun A. van Dijk’s frameworks. The data consist of textual units including narrative structures, dialogues, slogans, and rule transformations within the novel. The findings reveal that domination in Animal Farm is not primarily sustained through physical coercion, but through symbolic communication practices that regulate meaning production, control collective memory, and normalize inequality. The consolidation of power operates through three main mechanisms: the construction of legitimacy, the normalization of inequality, and the production of obedience and silence. Obedience emerges not as mere absence of resistance, but as the outcome of value internalization and systematic restriction of critical articulation. These results underscore that the stability of domination largely depends on communication’s capacity to shape social consciousness and constrain collective thought.

References

Asteria, Prima Vidya, LANDASAN BUDAYA KOMUNIKASI: Dasar Teori Dan Struktur Makna Dalam Budaya Komunikasi (Madza Media, 2025)

Barus, Friska, and Marzuti Isra, ‘Bahasa Sebagai Cermin Relasi Kuasa Dalam Komunikasi Antara Pekerja Dan Manajemen Di Lingkungan Institut Teknologi Sawit Indonesia: Analisis Wacana Kritis’, Triangulasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Kebahasaan, Kesastraan, Dan Pembelajaran, 5.2 (2025), pp. 129–37

Creswell, John W, and Cheryl N Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches (Sage publications, 2016)

Van Dijk, Teun A, ‘Critical Discourse Analysis’, The Handbook of Discourse Analysis 2015, 2015, pp. 466–85

——, ‘Discourse, Context and Cognition’, Discourse Studies, 8.1 (2006), pp. 159–77

——, ‘Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis’, Discourse & Society, 4.2 (1993), pp. 249–83

Fadeli, Muhamad, Filsafat Komunikasi: Konstruksi Makna Digital (Jakad Media Publishing, 2025)

Fairclough, Norman, Analysing Discourse (routledge London, 2003), CCLXX

——, Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (Routledge, 2013)

——, ‘Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities’, Discourse & Society, 4.2 (1993), pp. 133–68

——, ‘Critical Discourse Analysis as a Method in Social Scientific’, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 113 (2001), p. 121

Faruk, H T, Metode Penelitian Sastra: Sebuah Penjelajahan Awal (Pustaka Pelajar, 2012)

Fauzan, Umar, Analisis Wacana Kritis: Menguak Ideologi Dalam Wacana (Idea Press Yogyakarta, 2016)

Foucault, Michel, Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews (Cornell University Press, 1980)

Gramsci, Antonio, and P Palan, ‘Americanism and Fordism’, Prison Notebooks, 1971, pp. 213–25

Huberman, Michael, and Matthew B Miles, The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion (sage, 2002)

Nasrudin, S H, M C E MH, and S E Nina Nursari, Buku Pengantar Sosiologi (Teori, Realitas, Dan Transformasi Sosial Di Abad 21) (Penerbit Widina, 2025)

Nugroho, Catur, Medianomics Ekonomi Politik Media Di Era Digital (Prenada Media, 2023)

Pardede, Parlindungan, Yumna Rasyid, and Miftahulkhairah Anwar, ‘Manipulasi Linguistik Sebagai Instrumen Politik Dalam Animal Farm: Sebuah Analisis Wacana Kritis’, Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 6.2 (2023), pp. 449–66

Press, U G M, Tentang Kuasa: Lingkup Kajian, Metodologi, Dan Pengajaran Ilmu Politik Dan Pemerintahan (UGM PRESS, 2024)

Ramah, Muchri, ‘Wacana Dalam Perkembangan Ilmu Sosial Modern’, Kinesik, 6.2 (2019), pp. 165–75

Rohmah, Siti, Komunikasi Politik 5.0: Strategi, Media, Dan Pengaruh Publik (CV Eureka Media Aksara, 2025)

Thompson, John B, Kritik Ideologi Global: Teori Sosial Kritis Tentang Relasi Ideologi Dan Komunikasi (IRCiSoD, 2015)

Wodak, Ruth, ‘The Discourse-Historical Approach’, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 1 (2001), pp. 63–94

Downloads

Published

30-06-2026

How to Cite

Power Communication and the Production of Obedience in Animal Farm: A Critical Discourse Analysis. (2026). Jurnal Peurawi: Media Kajian Komunikasi Islam, 9(1), 94-111. https://doi.org/10.22373/s35tv741