Komunikasi Rekonsiliasi melalui Tradisi Mangan Murum di Bener Meriah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22373/a94zf928Keywords:
reconciliation communication, mangan murum, autoethnography, ritual communication, peacebuildingAbstract
This study examines reconciliation communication through the Mangan Murum tradition in Bener Meriah Regency as a sociocultural space for rebuilding relationships among post-conflict multiethnic communities, particularly the Acehnese, Gayo, and Javanese. It analyzes how reconciliation communication is constructed through local cultural practices involving multiple social actors across the stages of initiation, dialogue, and collective ritual enactment. Using a qualitative approach with critical autoethnography, the researcher actively participated in the reconciliation process from stakeholder engagement to the implementation of the Mangan Murum ritual on August 10, 2025. Data were collected through participant observation, in-depth interviews, documentation, and reflective field notes. The findings show that reconciliation is gradually constructed through communication processes embedded in social interactions and cultural rituals rather than formal institutional mechanisms alone. The Mangan Murum tradition functions as a symbolic communicative space that restores trust, solidarity, and collective identity among communities affected by conflict. This study proposes the concept of Ritual Reconciliation Communication, defined as reconciliation enacted through communal ritual practices that reconstruct post-conflict social relations. The concept extends ritual communication and conflict transformation perspectives while highlighting indigenous cultural traditions as sustainable instruments for peacebuilding in multicultural societies.
References
Aceh, Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi. “Laporan Pelaksanaan Program Mangan Murum Kabupaten Bener Meriah Tahun 2025.” Banda Aceh: Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi Aceh, 2025.
———. “Peulara Damee (Merawat Perdamaian): Laporan Temuan Komisi Kebenaran Dan Rekonsiliasi Aceh.” Banda Aceh: KKR Aceh, 2023.
Afriani, Rini. “Analisis Struktur Melengkan.” Master Bahasa 6, no. 1 (2018): 67–77.
Autesserre, S. The Frontlines of Peace. Oxford University Press, 2021.
Braun, V, and V Clarke. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, no. 2 (2006): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Carey, J W. Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society. Routledge, 2009.
Creswell, John W, and Cheryl N Poth. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2018.
Ellis, C, T E Adams, and A P Bochner. “Autoethnography: An Overview.” Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung 36, no. 4 (2011): 273–90. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23032294.
Galtung, J. Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization. International Peace Research Institute, 1996.
Ginty, R Mac. Everyday Peace: How so-Called Ordinary People Can Disrupt Violent Conflict. Oxford University Press, 2021.
Habermas, J. The Theory of Communicative Action. Beacon Press, 1984.
Irma, Ade. “Penerapan Komunikasi Antarbudaya Dai Dan Daiyah Dalam Berakwah Di Aceh” 7, no. 1 (2024): 37–60.
Lederach, J P. Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. United States Institute of Peace Press, 1997.
Melalatoa, M Junus. Budaya Gayo. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1997.
Moleong, Lexy J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2021.
Paffenholz, T. Civil Society and Peacebuilding. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2010.
Putnam, Robert D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000.
Richmond, O P. A Post-Liberal Peace. Routledge, 2011.
Rozi, Fakhrur, and Nazil Mumtaz Al-Mujtahid. “ANALISIS KOMUNIKASI KRISIS PADA KEMENTERIAN AGAMA DALAM PENYELENGGARAAN IBADAH HAJI 2025” 9, no. 1 (2026).
Serli, Al Zuhri, Aulia Risky, and Said Fadhlain. “Makna Simbolik Pada Kain Tabekh Dalam Adat Istiadat Kota Subulussalam Ditinjau Dari Semiotika Peirce.” Jurnal Peurawi: Media Kajian Komunikasi Islam 8, no. 2 (2025): 81–98. https://doi.org/10.22373/jnmmhb77.
Sofyan, Heru. “Peran Komunikasi Lintas Budaya Dalam Membangun Keharmonisan Antar Santri (Studi Kasus Pesantren Life Skill Daarun Najaah)” 6, no. 2 (2023): 127–38.
Tabachnick, B G, and L S Fidell. Using Multivariate Statistics. Edited by 5. Allyn & Bacon, 2007.
Tobias, S, and T M Duffy. Constructivist Instruction: Success or Failure? Routledge, 2009.
Usman, A R. Komunikasi Strategis Indonesia–Tiongkok. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2021.
Walidin, W, S Idris, and Tabrani ZA. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif & Grounded Theory. FTK Ar-Raniry Press, 2015.
ZA., Tabrani. Menggugat Logika Nalar Rasionalisme Aristoteles. Mizan, 2017.
Zulyadi, Teuku. “Komunikasi Pembangunan Masyarakat; Sebuah Model Audit Sosial Multistakeholder.” KOMUNIKASI PEMBANGUNAN MASYARAKAT; SEBUAH MODEL AUDIT SOSIAL MULTISTAKEHOLDER 1, no. 1 (2018): 1–15. http://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/peurawi.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arief Fadhillah, Rusli Yusuf, Ishak Hasan, Masrizal, Ella Fitriana (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




PUBLISHER